James Gunn hasn’t cast Wonder Woman yet. He’s said so publicly, repeatedly. The script isn’t finished. No announcements are coming. And yet, the moment certain names entered the speculation cycle, a familiar alarm went off in certain corners of fandom.
Those names: Adria Arjona, Guatemalan and Puerto Rican. Eva De Dominici, Argentine of Italian descent. Melissa Barrera, Mexican. Ana de Armas, Cuban and Spanish. Every actress generating serious industry buzz around Diana Prince carries Latina or Mediterranean heritage. Gunn himself, when asked about Arjona, said she would make a great Wonder Woman.
That was enough. Before a single casting announcement, before a screen test result leaked, before one frame of footage existed, the gatekeepers were already at their posts. And their complaint, as it always is, came down to one thing.
She doesn’t have blue eyes.
This argument gets made every time a Wonder Woman casting cycle begins. It gets presented as a matter of fidelity to the source material, a reasonable concern from devoted fans who simply want the character done right. It is none of those things. It is a standard invented after the fact, applied selectively, rooted in a fundamental misreading of both the comics and the mythology those comics drew from, and its function, whether the people making the argument know it or not, is to define Wonder Woman as the exclusive property of one very specific physical ideal.
The receipts are sitting right there. All you have to do is look at them.
Every argument has a foundation, and the foundation of the blue-eyes demand is the claim that the comics established a definitive look for Wonder Woman, and that look includes blue eyes. The version of the character most frequently cited is George Perez’s celebrated 1987 post-Crisis reboot, which gave Diana black hair, blue eyes, and a look that became iconic for an entire generation of readers. Perez is a legendary artist and his run is genuinely great, but treating one artist’s interpretation from one era as the permanent, binding, canonical appearance of a character who has been drawn by hundreds of artists across more than eighty years of publication history is not fidelity to the source material. It is the selective elevation of one source above all others, chosen because it happens to match the conclusion the fan already wants to reach.
Here is the problem with that selective reading: the earliest Wonder Woman comics tell a different story. The historical record on this is worth examining carefully, because it demolishes the comics accuracy argument from a completely different direction. Wonder Woman originally appeared in the Golden Age comics with brown eyes (also here in Live-Action TV) The blue eyes that fans now treat as a canonical, non-negotiable feature of the character were not established in the source material at all. They were cemented by the Lynda Carter television series in the 1970s, and the influence of that show ran so deep into the culture that subsequent comic book artists began drawing flashbacks to the Golden Age character with blue eyes she never actually had. The sacred standard of authenticity these fans are invoking was handed to them by a half-Mexican actress from Arizona. The comics changed to match her, not the other way around.
What the eye-color demand crowd never mentions is that in those same comics, Wonder Woman’s black hair carries prominent blue streaks, a standard colorist shorthand of the era for depicting the sheen and depth of dark hair under light. It was a technical workaround, not a character design decision. No one in the history of comics fandom has ever stood up and demanded that Wonder Woman have blue hair to honor the source material, because everyone understands, when it is convenient for them to understand, that the blue streaks are a printing artifact and not a literal character trait. The moment that same logic is applied to eye color, the entire argument for blue eyes as a canonical requirement dissolves. Either the coloring conventions of that era are authoritative, in which case she has blue hair and the cosplay community has been getting her wrong for decades, or they are not, in which case citing comic book eye color as a hard casting requirement is arguing in bad faith.
The mythology argument is where the blue-eyes crowd most thoroughly defeats itself, because the case they are making requires the audience to not actually know anything about Greek mythology. Wonder Woman draws from the legend of the Amazons, and the Amazons in ancient Greek sources were not Greek. They were consistently placed by ancient writers in Anatolia, Scythia, and the regions surrounding the Black Sea, territories that correspond to modern Turkey, Ukraine, and the Caucasus. The Greeks wrote about the Amazons as a foreign civilization, a people existing outside and beyond the boundaries of the Greek world. They were fascinating to Greek storytellers precisely because they were other, because they represented a mode of existence that stood apart from Hellenic norms. When someone argues that Wonder Woman should look like a classical Greek figure because she comes from Greek mythology, they are not demonstrating knowledge of that mythology. They are demonstrating that they have absorbed a vague cultural impression of ancient Greece and are using it to launder a preference that has nothing to do with Themyscira.
The archaeological record adds another layer to this. The culture most scholars associate with the historical basis for Amazon legends is the Sauromatian and Sarmatian peoples, nomadic groups whose burial mounds have been excavated across the Eurasian steppe. Those excavations have found women buried with weapons, armor, and the physical evidence of lives spent on horseback and in combat. These were not Mediterranean women in peplos and sandals. They were steppe warriors whose geographic and ethnic roots would place them, by any honest reckoning, considerably closer to Central Asia than to Northern Europe. The physical ideal the gatekeepers are projecting onto Wonder Woman has no basis in the mythology, no basis in the archaeology, and no basis in honest engagement with the comics history.
Aristotle, for what it is worth, wrote about blue-eyed men in the Eudemian Ethics without assigning them any mark of superiority, and added that the blue-eyed man does not see clearly. The ancient Greeks, the very civilization these fans are invoking as their authority, did not regard light eyes as a heroic or superior trait. The demand for blue eyes as proof of mythological authenticity is being made in the name of a culture that did not share that value.
Which brings us to the question of what the people who actually wrote the character have to say about what she should look like. Elliot S. Maggin is not a casual observer. He is one of the principal architects of Wonder Woman’s voice and mythology during the Bronze Age of comics, a writer whose work on DC characters across the 1970s and 1980s helped define what those characters meant to an entire generation of readers. He is also active on Quora, where he has weighed in on exactly this question. His answer was not complicated. “Wonder Woman is Greek/North African and should probably look kind of Sicilian at the very least.” That is the verdict of a man who wrote the character, delivered without hedging or diplomatic softening. Greek/North African. Sicilian at the very least. Sicilian is a meaningful ethnic marker here, because Sicilian ancestry is famously layered, drawing from Greek, Arab, Norman, and African roots across centuries of conquest and cultural exchange. It is about as far from the Northern European phenotype the gatekeepers are demanding as you can get while still remaining in the Mediterranean world. When one of Wonder Woman’s own writers tells you what she should look like, and his answer describes a woman of Mediterranean and North African heritage, the comics accuracy argument does not just lose credibility. It collapses entirely.
The Lynda Carter contradiction sits at the center of this entire argument, and it is the one the gatekeepers have never been able to answer, because most of them do not know it exists. Lynda Carter is the foundational Wonder Woman for millions of people. Her portrayal in the 1970s television series did not merely influence the character’s cultural footprint, it defined it. She is the version of Wonder Woman that lodged itself in the collective imagination of an entire generation, the image conjured automatically when someone who grew up in that era hears the name. She is also, by her own account, half Mexican. Her mother, Juana Córdova, was Mexican, with roots in Chihuahua, and Carter has spoken about her heritage and her upbringing in Arizona with deep Mexican cultural roots throughout her career. What makes this detail even more pointed is that during her rise to fame in the 1970s, Hollywood actively encouraged Carter to distance herself from those roots. The heritage was deliberately obscured during the exact period when she was on television cementing the visual standard the gatekeepers now treat as sacred. They did not just build their ideal Wonder Woman on a Latina woman without knowing it. They built it on a Latina woman whose identity was being systematically hidden from them.
None of this generated a single moment of organized outrage from the people who now patrol the gates of Wonder Woman casting with a checklist of acceptable phenotypes. The woman who gave the character her most iconic live-action form, who established the look these same fans treat as the gold standard, who is directly responsible for the blue eyes they now demand as proof of authenticity, is the daughter of a Mexican immigrant. They built their entire vision of what Wonder Woman is supposed to look like on a Latina woman, in complete ignorance of that fact, and the irony becomes inescapable the moment names like Adria Arjona and Melissa Barrera enter the casting conversation and the same crowd reaches for their authenticity complaints.
The selective application of the standard tells you everything about what the standard is actually measuring. It has never been about ethnic or physical fidelity to the source material. It has been about whether an actress clears an unspoken threshold of acceptable whiteness, a threshold applied not to heritage or background, which nobody bothered to check, but to visual presentation. Lynda Carter passed that threshold. Gal Gadot, despite being a light-skinned Israeli woman, did not pass it cleanly for a significant portion of the early backlash against her casting, and the reason had everything to do with her ethnicity being explicitly known and Jewish. Adria Arjona, Eva De Dominici, Melissa Barrera, Ana de Armas, their names in the conversation are enough to trigger the alarm, before a screen test, before a costume fitting, before a single frame of footage exists.
The Gal Gadot backlash is where the subtext of this entire argument became text, and it deserves more than a polite acknowledgment because what it exposed was not a fandom dispute about casting decisions. It exposed the ideological skeleton underneath the blue-eyes demand. When Gadot was cast as Wonder Woman in 2013, the objections came fast and from multiple directions, some about her physical build, some about her acting experience, but a significant and vocal portion of the early backlash centered specifically on her being Israeli and Jewish. This was not coincidental, and it was not incidental. It was the through-line made visible.
Consider what was actually happening. Wonder Woman is a character created by William Moulton Marston, conceived and launched during the rise of fascism in Europe, explicitly designed as a counter-mythology to the authoritarian violence consuming the world at the moment of her creation. The complaint being lodged against the actress cast to play her was rooted in her Jewish identity. The people invoking Greek mythology and comic book accuracy to police Wonder Woman’s appearance were, in a meaningful number of cases, doing so against a Jewish woman playing a character created as an antifascist symbol. The historical resonance of that is not subtle, and it is not accidental.
What the Gadot backlash clarified is that the blue-eyes demand is not really about eye color, and it was never about comics accuracy. It is about maintaining Wonder Woman as the property of a very specific physical and ethnic ideal, one that maps with uncomfortable precision onto what the twentieth century called Aryan beauty standards. Dark hair is acceptable because it appears in the comics and because it does not disrupt the overall template. But blue eyes are the feature that converts Mediterranean ambiguity into Northern European legibility, the marker that keeps Wonder Woman safely within a very specific kind of whiteness regardless of what the mythology says, regardless of what the archaeology says, regardless of what her own writers say, and regardless of the fact that the woman who defined the character’s most iconic live action form was the half-Mexican daughter of a Mexican immigrant whose identity was being actively suppressed by Hollywood during the very years she was cementing that standard. Whether the fans making this argument know what they are carrying or not, they are carrying it.
Return for a moment to where this article began. James Gunn has not cast Wonder Woman. No announcement has been made, no screen tests have leaked, no costume has been fitted. The names in circulation are Adria Arjona, Eva De Dominici, Melissa Barrera, Ana de Armas. Every single actress generating serious industry and fan excitement around the role carries Latina or Mediterranean heritage. Gunn himself looked at that list and said Arjona would make a great Wonder Woman. And before a single frame of footage existed, before a casting announcement of any kind, the gatekeepers were already at their posts complaining about eye color and authenticity. That is not a response to a casting decision. That is a preemptive strike against a demographic, triggered by nothing more than the circulation of names that do not fit a predetermined template.
That template has a precise description, and the precise description is Northern European phenotype. Not Greek. Not Mediterranean. Not Amazonian in any mythologically coherent sense. Northern European, meaning the particular configuration of features that twentieth century racist ideology elevated into an ideal of heroic beauty and encoded under the word Aryan. Blue eyes are not incidental to that template. They are the certification it requires. Dark hair alone is acceptable because it appears in the comics and does not disrupt the overall picture. But blue eyes are the feature that converts Mediterranean ambiguity into Northern European legibility, the marker that keeps Wonder Woman safely within a very specific kind of whiteness regardless of what the mythology says, regardless of what the archaeology says, regardless of what her own writers say, and regardless of the fact that the woman who defined the character’s most iconic live action form was the half-Mexican daughter of a Mexican immigrant who never told anyone, and whose heritage nobody thought to check until the damage to the template’s credibility was already done.
The through-line connecting all of it, the blue-eyes demand, the Gadot backlash, the preemptive complaints about Latina actresses who have not even been cast yet, is not a series of isolated fandom grievances. It is a single continuous argument about who gets to be a hero, dressed in the language of source material fidelity and mythological authenticity, and it falls apart the moment you apply it honestly to the actual sources. The mythology places the Amazons in Central Asia and Anatolia. The archaeology buries their closest real-world analogs on the Eurasian steppe. The comics gave the character brown eyes in the Golden Age until a half-Mexican actress on television changed them. One of her own writers says she should look North African and Sicilian at minimum. And the standard being used to exclude women who fit that description far better than the demanded template does has a name, and that name is not comics accuracy.
Wonder Woman was created in 1941 by a man who understood exactly what he was building and why the moment demanded it. William Moulton Marston launched her into the world as fascism was metastasizing across Europe, as the ideology of Aryan supremacy was being written into law and enforced at gunpoint, as the specific belief system that ranks human beings by the color of their eyes and the geography of their ancestry was reaching the height of its murderous ambition. He created a warrior goddess from outside the Western world, drew on mythology that placed her origins in Anatolia and the Black Sea, and put her in the hands of an artist whose vision of her reflected dark eyes and Mediterranean features before the printing technology of the era gave way to the colorist conventions that would eventually, decades later, be misread as canonical character design. The character was an argument. She was always an argument. The people now demanding she conform to a Northern European beauty standard, invoking the very aesthetic ideology Marston built her to oppose, have not read the argument carefully enough.
James Gunn will cast his Wonder Woman when the script is ready and the right actress emerges from the process. If that actress is Latina, or Mediterranean, or reflects the North African and Sicilian heritage that Elliot S. Maggin, a man who actually wrote her, says the character should carry, she will be a more faithful Wonder Woman than anything the blue-eyes crowd is demanding. She will look the way the mythology intended, the way the archaeology supports, the way the original comics depicted before a television show rewrote the visual standard and fandom mistook the rewrite for scripture. The gatekeepers will complain anyway, because the argument was never about the character. It was always about the template. And the template has been wrong from the beginning.
The Short Version: Quotable Takeaways
- Wonder Woman had brown eyes in the original Golden Age comics. The blue eyes came from the Lynda Carter TV show. The comics changed to match her, not the other way around.
- The woman whose look the gatekeepers treat as sacred canon was a half-Mexican actress from Arizona whose heritage Hollywood was actively suppressing during filming.
- The Amazons in Greek mythology were not Greek. Ancient sources placed them in Anatolia and Scythia. Demanding a Northern European look in the name of Greek mythology means you haven’t read the mythology.
- Aristotle wrote about blue-eyed men without assigning them superiority and noted they don’t see clearly. The culture these fans invoke as authority didn’t share their values.
- Elliot S. Maggin, a man who actually wrote Wonder Woman, says she should look “Greek/North African” and “Sicilian at the very least.” Sicilian ancestry draws from Greek, Arab, Norman, and African roots. That is the opposite of Northern European.
- The backlash started before anyone was cast. That’s not a response to a casting decision. That’s a preemptive strike against a demographic.
- The standard has a name. It isn’t comics accuracy. It’s Northern European phenotype. Blue eyes are the certification it requires.
- Marston created Wonder Woman as fascism rose across Europe. The people demanding she conform to an Aryan beauty standard haven’t read the argument he was making.
Add Comment